By Elizabeth Russell

Fetal Alcohol Spectrum DisorderThis chapter has been taken in part from the chapter on FASD in my first book by Dr Sterling Clarren.

Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder is an umbrella term for conditions that are caused as a result of drinking alcohol during pregnancy but is not a diagnosis. Alcohol is a substance that causes birth defects and as such can affect the unborn child’s development. If a woman drinks while she is pregnant the alcohol, no matter how much or how little, crosses the placental barrier and circulates through the baby’s system. However, it remains with the baby longer because the mother metabolises the alcohol with a fully formed liver, whereas the baby’s liver is small and undeveloped so the blood alcohol level of the baby is the same as that of the mother. This means that there is no known level of alcohol consumption during pregnancy that is safe for the baby.

There is a range of effects on the spectrum from mild to severe. The mild effects may not result in mental retardation, but it is possible that the brain has been damaged and the executive functioning (the higher order thinking and judgment skills) of that person compromised. While the child grows and appears normal there could be subtle, and not so subtle, behavioural problems associated with the prenatal injury.

At the severe end there can be the same behavioural problems but the child will also have the distinctive facial features of FAS. These facial features and more detailed symptoms and characteristics are described later in this chapter.

Much of the research that has been conducted has been in North America by researchers such as Professors Sterling Clarren, Susan Astley and Ab Chudley. Sterling Clarren’s primate and mouse research on alcohol and pregnancy found that the lip and philtrum anomaly of (full) FAS occurred in a very small window of time which would be on the 19th to 20th day after conception in the human – the period called gastrulation. Since the diagnosis of FAS depends on having the full set of facial features then it is likely that only exposures that include the 19th or 20th day will attract the diagnosis of FAS. However, a child can still have a serious brain injury without the facial characteristics.

This work strengthens the importance of referring to the condition in terms of the full spectrum rather than the syndrome alone. This is why there is a perception in Australia that fetal alcohol spectrum disorder is rare. Our medical profession has had very limited training in diagnosis and many only recognise, if at all, those children with very obvious facial features – those with full blown fetal alcohol syndrome.

However, according to Professor Clarren’s research, if a mother does not drink on the 19th or 20th day, the child may still have brain damage but no facial features. It is well documented in North America that children with facial features are only the tip of the iceberg. Overseas studies show that for every child diagnosed with full FAS there will be another three to ten with alcohol-related neurodevelopmental disorders, the conditions that remain on the spectrum when the full syndrome is removed .

In North America and Canada, multidisciplinary teams are trained to diagnose FASD. Team members typically include, but are not limited to, physicians, psychiatrists, psychologists, speech/language pathologists, occupational therapists, and social workers.

There are NO such interdisciplinary teams in Australia, nor are there many ‘experts’ so it is particularly concerning that we have high profile members of the medical profession who have obviously had no training in the diagnosis of FASD and presumably very limited understanding of the disability, making uninformed and dangerously misleading statements indicating that in order to get a diagnosis of full Fetal Alcohol Syndrome at least eight drinks a day would have to be consumed when in fact obtaining a diagnosis of full FAS is not reliant on how much is consumed but when it is consumed.

This condition is not restricted to the indigenous population or alcoholic women; it is easier to identify in the children of alcoholic women but FASD can and does strike a family who may have no idea that their child is affected until he or she reaches puberty when behavioural problems become more marked. By then it may be difficult to relate back to the pregnancy and the few glasses of wine each day or even, in some cases, each week.

Dr Margaret Clarke, an eminent Canadian FASD researcher, has found that in Canada 96% of mothers with alcohol-affected children are social drinkers, and only 4% are alcohol dependent . This makes an accurate diagnosis more difficult and having a multidisciplinary team undertake the diagnosis more necessary.

FASD can cause behavioural problems similar to those caused by the environment. However, the antisocial or delinquent behaviour caused by the environment sometimes can be resolved if given appropriate and consistent assistance at the right time, because while the behaviour and the psychology are abnormal, the brain has not been physically injured. People who have FASD have a brain injury so will not be able to make the necessary changes, even though they seem to have the ability to do so. FASD is not an excuse for bad behaviour; it is the reason for it.

Sufferers often try to do what is expected of them, but it is like assuming persons in wheelchairs will be able to walk just because we tell them to. The difference, of course, is that we wouldn’t expect people with paraplegia or quadriplegia to walk if we yell at them enough, but every day people with brain injuries are expected to ‘walk’ when they are in metaphorical wheelchairs. Moreover, no one can see their ‘wheelchair’, no one knows about this injury because it is not visible; and it would certainly not be obvious that they have FASD simply by talking with them for a short time, unless they have the distinctive facial features or a lower IQ.

A common mistake is to assume that because a person can ‘talk the talk’ he or she can also ‘walk the walk’. This is not true for people with FASD. Their expressive language is far better than their receptive language and so they can say they understand what is being said, and can even repeat what has been said, but if it’s a complicated or abstract concept or if there is more than one idea, instruction or topic, then it is unlikely that information will be accurately interpreted.

Only a relatively small number of people with FASD have a low IQ and these individuals will usually have access to services as a result. However, gaining access to services is challenging for affected people without an advocate because they won’t always present as having a disability yet will have compromised executive functioning. For them it will be a ‘catch-22’ situation where without a low IQ, they will be difficult for others to identify, yet because of the prenatal alcohol exposure are generally unable to advocate for themselves. Without either an advocate or insight into their disability these individuals will be unlikely to proactively access the services they will desperately need during their lifetime. One of the ways they are like